Welcome & Thank You...
...for visiting the Blog of the Nonviolent Choice Directory.
These measures include post abortion healing; male responsibility; comprehensive sexual/reproductive health education; all voluntary pregnancy prevention methods, plus rape and incest prevention & treatment; and life-affirming ways to get through crisis pregnancy and beyond.
Along with responding to our current action alerts, and participating in our Blog, you are welcome to volunteer with us.
We feature commentary but most of all action alerts on the same positive, abortion-reducing measures we cover in the Directory.
These measures include post abortion healing; male responsibility; comprehensive sexual/reproductive health education; all voluntary pregnancy prevention methods, plus rape and incest prevention & treatment; and life-affirming ways to get through crisis pregnancy and beyond.
Along with responding to our current action alerts, and participating in our Blog, you are welcome to volunteer with us.
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
US Supreme Court Gives Cruel & Unusual Punishment a Thumbs Up
Reference: Lethal Injection Web-Based Clearinghouse
The US Supreme Court has ruled that lethal injection is not cruel and unusual punishment for prisoners and therefore is constitutional.
Why? Because it does not pose a "substantial or objectively intolerable risk of serious harm."
Aside from the by no means settled question of whether lethal injection causes pain and distress--is not being killed itself "a substantial and objectively intolerable risk of serious harm"?
You don't have to be one of the most highly placed lawyers in the land to figure that one out. Or...maybe you do have to not be one.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that lethal injection is not cruel and unusual punishment for prisoners and therefore is constitutional.
Why? Because it does not pose a "substantial or objectively intolerable risk of serious harm."
Aside from the by no means settled question of whether lethal injection causes pain and distress--is not being killed itself "a substantial and objectively intolerable risk of serious harm"?
You don't have to be one of the most highly placed lawyers in the land to figure that one out. Or...maybe you do have to not be one.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment